Skip to main content

Confusing change with progress


In a previous piece I encourage people to question their beliefs. I asked the question: Why do people follow/subscribe to popular thoughts and ideas?

It is a question that probably has several answers rather than one, but high on that list for me is the propensity people have for confusing change with progress.

Progressive is a label that many aspire too. It just seems so smart, doesn’t it? Modern and post-modern societies generally regard all the changes from the pre-modern area (like the beliefs listed above) as ‘progressive’. I wonder if most of the changes aren’t merely changes rather than progress?

People don’t understand progress.

A lighthouse can be progressive. Most people would see a lighthouse as something static, never-changing and therefore incapable of making ‘progress’. But every time the blinking lighthouse helps ships navigate and steer clear of the rocks, it progressively saves lives.

It is its very static, unchanging nature that allows it to do the job and make a cumulative (progressive) difference. If the lighthouse in fact moved location or occasionally determined not to blink as scheduled, it will cost lives and we become less safe. That shouldn’t be anyone’s idea of progress.

All change is not progress and all progress is not change.

The dictionary does not mention ‘change’, but rather makes it clear that progress is development towards an improved or more advanced condition. And often, having an eternal, unchanging condition/ perspective is more helpful than one that is fluid and ever-changing.

So, don’t dismiss everything that is old as primitive, and don’t disregard every classical perspective as archaic because every change is not an advancement.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hey Bruce Springsteen; you hypocrite

Bruce, I love your music man. It is old-fashioned, but I like it. My favourite song is actually not Born in the USA or the like, but Streets of Philadelphia. Not only is it a nice tune, I really like the message too. But you know, I don’t like how you play your politics. Make no mistake, I don’t MIND your politics and I am sure we can agree on a lot of things – and even in this case I may even agree with your belief. So the point is not where you stand on the issue.  But I don’t like the hypocritical way you play it. So you cancel a concert and boycott a state that you disagree with. I am sure you think that it is your way to express your support for people who are getting the short straw. I am sure you see it as your right to play in front of whoever and wherever. But Bruce, can I ask you this: Have you refunded all the money you made from selling songs to the states that hold a different view to you? Have you asked those citizens not to buy your...

An Open Letter to the CEO

Dear Mr CEO You said your job is to develop a vision and create an organisation with the right values that will make that vision a reality, so I thought I would drop this note in your lap for consideration. It is my contention that what goes for ‘strategy’ and ‘best practice’ in the modern corporate boardroom is a terminal degree of “me too-ism”. I think you have bought into a narrative that is promulgated by people who have a gnostic view of the world and specific agendas that appeal to the pseudo-thinkers of the world, but are in reality going to lead your organisation to its premature demise. OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY Over the years business organisations have been eaten away slowly from the inside by social justice warriors (SJWs). How this happened, requires us to go back a few years and in the evolution of the business organisation. Once you understand that, you will see how it has infested your organisation. Business organisations used to have a simple, clear obje...

If not confidence, what is it then?

Confidence almost invariably leads complacency to over-confidence which leads to’ arseholeness’. There must be rare occasions when this progression does not naturally occur, but I can’t think of an example. There is a truism that’s states: Confidence breeds confidence. That IS the nature of confidence. So, by definition, confidence always ‘grows’ – and inevitably people don’t know when to stop. I am sure some self-help gurus will argue that you can never have too much confidence. (I’d say, think ice-cream.) Some gurus will say that the problem is rarely once of too much confidence and that the bigger issue is growing confidence. To this I say: maybe so, but only if you understand the need to manage the confidence growth – and knowing when to stop. THAT is never taught – and that is my issue. I don’t believe lack of confidence is the opposite of confidence. I am not advocating being unsure. What the world desperately needs, is more humility. Old-fashioned and contrary to the culture ...