Skip to main content

Will history look kindly on George W Bush?

I am no apologist for George W Bush. Don’t know the man, can’t say that I like him or dislike him. I don’t even know where I stand on the “war in Iraq” thing. But I did see his popularity plummet from record highs to record lows without changing anything. So it must have been the people who changed their opinions. That got me thinking whether history will judge George kindly, or are the opinionated masses right?

I am kinda leaning towards George…

  1. When the country was crying out for someone to take charge, he did just that. He made a promise on the spot and showed real leadership in a moment of national (international!) crisis.
  2. When that same country stopped loving and admiring him, he stuck to his guns. When he had the opportunity to do the popular thing and withdraw from Iraq, he did the unpopular thing and stuck to helping the people that suffered because of the war.
  3. The war might not be over, but in the end the atrocity of war was less than the atrocity of the dictatorship and people were free, even if they weren’t safe. He did not count the cost of removing but a handful of evil people in dollars; and the world is better place for what he has done.
  4. When the planes flew into the skyscrapers, he cried.
  5. He got to be President, twice, even though a lot of smart people said he was not the sharpest tool in the shed.
  6. He remained faithful to his values, his wife and his God, even though he was mocked for it. He did not do drugs or get pissed in public – which is a helluva lot more than some of us can say.
  7. He could have gone it alone, but he did not. But when he was abandoned and isolated, he stuck to his alliance in good faith.
  8. He remained focussed on the big picture threat of terrorism – even when it became an inconvenient truth.
  9. He re-built the buildings and healed the scars with no regard to the money, but cared for only the pride of the nation.
  10. He still laughed at himself, despite being under more pressure than most humans beings could possibly bear.
Now, he may dumb and the terrorism thing is not solved by a long shot (no pun intended). I am not sure he can be blamed for either. Whose to know whether he is simply obdurate, or whether he is committed to the cause. In the end, he did all that could be asked of any person: give it your best shot.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hey Bruce Springsteen; you hypocrite

Bruce, I love your music man. It is old-fashioned, but I like it. My favourite song is actually not Born in the USA or the like, but Streets of Philadelphia. Not only is it a nice tune, I really like the message too. But you know, I don’t like how you play your politics. Make no mistake, I don’t MIND your politics and I am sure we can agree on a lot of things – and even in this case I may even agree with your belief. So the point is not where you stand on the issue.  But I don’t like the hypocritical way you play it. So you cancel a concert and boycott a state that you disagree with. I am sure you think that it is your way to express your support for people who are getting the short straw. I am sure you see it as your right to play in front of whoever and wherever. But Bruce, can I ask you this: Have you refunded all the money you made from selling songs to the states that hold a different view to you? Have you asked those citizens not to buy your...
Post a Comment
Read more

An Open Letter to the CEO

Dear Mr CEO You said your job is to develop a vision and create an organisation with the right values that will make that vision a reality, so I thought I would drop this note in your lap for consideration. It is my contention that what goes for ‘strategy’ and ‘best practice’ in the modern corporate boardroom is a terminal degree of “me too-ism”. I think you have bought into a narrative that is promulgated by people who have a gnostic view of the world and specific agendas that appeal to the pseudo-thinkers of the world, but are in reality going to lead your organisation to its premature demise. OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY Over the years business organisations have been eaten away slowly from the inside by social justice warriors (SJWs). How this happened, requires us to go back a few years and in the evolution of the business organisation. Once you understand that, you will see how it has infested your organisation. Business organisations used to have a simple, clear obje...
Post a Comment
Read more

If not confidence, what is it then?

Confidence almost invariably leads complacency to over-confidence which leads to’ arseholeness’. There must be rare occasions when this progression does not naturally occur, but I can’t think of an example. There is a truism that’s states: Confidence breeds confidence. That IS the nature of confidence. So, by definition, confidence always ‘grows’ – and inevitably people don’t know when to stop. I am sure some self-help gurus will argue that you can never have too much confidence. (I’d say, think ice-cream.) Some gurus will say that the problem is rarely once of too much confidence and that the bigger issue is growing confidence. To this I say: maybe so, but only if you understand the need to manage the confidence growth – and knowing when to stop. THAT is never taught – and that is my issue. I don’t believe lack of confidence is the opposite of confidence. I am not advocating being unsure. What the world desperately needs, is more humility. Old-fashioned and contrary to the culture ...
Post a Comment
Read more